Things I'm Obsessed With


August 2017

So, How Were the VMAs?

Screen shot 2017-08-28 at 12.27.17 PM.png
Screenshot by Jenn Murphy

If you, like most people on my various social media feeds, spent last night watching the 80-something minute long “Game of Thrones” season finale then you likely missed this year’s MTV Video Music Awards. In a pretty bad PR move on their part, MTV aired the VMAs largely against “Game of Thrones.” Come on, MTV, even “Power” knew better than that.


To be honest though, you didn’t miss much in the world of music videos and the people who make them. The show overall was a little bland, although anything was bound to disappoint after last year’s non-stop Beyonce-Rihanna concert where they also gave some people some awards. As a host, Katy Perry kind of felt like the older person in the room trying to make cool with the kids and mostly failing. An early reference to “The Handmaid’s Tale” fell on deaf ears (shout out to MTV for the hilarious shot of a confused Fifth Harmony trying to make sense of it) as did a fidget spinner joke. The worst bit, an extended take on the failed Fyre Festival, felt like it would have only worked if it had been done in the five minutes immediately following that fiasco, not months later when people have clearly moved on.


While a VMAs host can really be a mixed bag in terms of quality, that can be let go if the performances are all exciting and elaborate. Unfortunately for last night, they really weren’t. While Kendrick Lamar opened the show with a performance that was literally fire, most of the other performances barely lit a spark. Ed Sheeran and Lil Uzi Vert had a super weird mash-up performance that felt more like something you’d get in the sixth hour of the Grammys, Fifth Harmony (presumably after googling “The Handmaid’s Tale”) threw some obvious shade at their recently departed former group member and Lorde, reportedly recovering from a bout with the flu, decided to dance her little heart out instead of singing. There were many more performances in addition to those, but they were largely forgettable and in some cases even cut short so MTV could go to a commercial break.


The show thrived the most when it fed into its newfound woke-ness. Appearances from a descendant of Robert E. Lee (who, for the record, was in support of statues of his relative being removed) and the mother of Heather Heyer, the woman who was tragically killed in Charlottesville several weeks ago, were truly moving, as was Pink’s directed at her daughter Video Vanguard acceptance speech and a performance of a song focused on mental illness by Logic, Alessia Cara and Khalid. As for the decision to nix the male and female specific categories for a combined Artist of the Year award, that was won by a man, Ed Sheeran, as were 10 of the 15 awards given out, so take from that what you will. (To be fair though, Kendrick Lamar deserves every VMA he won last night for Humble. That video is stunning.)


Oh, and Taylor Swift debuted her newest music video. It was…a lot.


Overall this year’s VMAs were not particularly memorable. There were definitely a few moments of excitement and interest, but for a three hour show they felt few and far between. Now that MTV is trying to bring actual music back to its channel with the upcoming returns of TRL and Unplugged, perhaps next year will be a much different story.


Did you watch the VMAs? If so, what did you think of the show? Did you watch “Game of Thrones” instead and feel the need to tell everyone about that? Wow, aren’t you so cool. So so cool. Tell all in the comments. And of course…


Stay classy.



Give Beyonce (Or Literally Any Female Artist) Her Own SiriusXM Radio Channel!

Screen shot 2017-08-21 at 3.20.18 PM
Photo courtesy of Google Images

The recent addition of a Beatles radio channel to SiriusXM got me thinking about which artists have their own individual SiriusXM radio channels (a.k.a channels named after them that primarily feature their music or music of their choosing). Elvis, Springsteen, Sinatra, Pitbull, Pearl Jam, The Grateful Dead, Jimmy Buffet, Tom Petty, Ozzy Osbourne, Eminem, Garth Brooks, Kenny Chesney, Willie Nelson, Kirk Franklin, B.B. King…all dudes.


Seriously. Every artist that has their own individually branded SiriusXM radio channel is a guy. What’s up with that?


It’s not like there aren’t any female artists who have a large enough songbook and a big enough following to deserve their own channel. Take Beyonce, for example. Six studio albums and four live albums is certainly enough to fill a day. (And that doesn’t even count her work with Destiny’s Child.) Plus, like other stations named after or focused on a single artist, Beyonce’s station could include music by artists related to her, like Solange and Jay-Z, as well as other artists in her orbit, including ones she has collaborated with or ones signed to her label.


And she’s not the only one. Barbara Streisand, Whitney Houston, Katy Perry, Rihanna, Stevie Nicks, Ariana Grande (who briefly had one that was tied in with her 2016 AMA win for Artist of the Year) and, as much as I hate to say it, Taylor Swift all definitely have the goods and the qualifications to garner their own radio channel. The fact that none of the above artists, or any female artist for that matter, have their own personally branded channel but 16 male bands or artists do is insane. Fourteen different sports channels, 6 different comedy channels, even Howard Stern has two channels to his name, but not one celebrating a female artist or the work of female artists? Come on, Sirius. You can do way better than that.


What do you think? Which female artist do you think deserves their own SiriusXM channel? Did you ignore all the warnings and stare directly at today’s solar eclipse without those ~super-cool~ protective glasses? If so, how are you reading this right now? Seriously. Share your secret in the comments. And, like always…


Stay classy.


When Series Finales Work (And When They Really Really Don’t)

Screen shot 2017-08-14 at 11.53.05 AM.png
Screenshot by Jenn Murphy

This past Saturday, the series finale of “Orphan Black,” the woefully under appreciated clone show where Tatiana Maslany has played like at least 12-15 different people flawlessly, aired. (I feel like I describe things as “woefully under appreciated” a lot. People need to appreciate things that deserve appreciation more!) It was a very satisfying finale, and it got me thinking about what makes a great series finale and what can cause a series finale to fail.


(Obligatory warning that there will probably be some series finale spoilers for various shows in the coming paragraphs. Proceed with caution.)


What made the “Orphan Black” series finale work is that it tied up some key loose ends (like killing off all of the baddies trying to make the lives of Tatiana Maslany’s many characters difficult) but left a few things open, so that we’d all have something to think about once the show had ended. How will Helena be as a mother? Will Cosima and Delphine be able to find all 270-something clones and inoculate them from the illness that plagues their kind? We don’t know! And that’s fine. (Although, it seems like the show’s creators might be on board for a movie continuation down the line. Not sure how I feel about that.) We don’t need to know everything. We just need to know enough to feel comfortable that the characters we love will be okay.


The same could be said about the perfect series finale of “Parks and Recreation,” although that one literally went into the future to show us most of the key moments of each main character’s life. Even though they did do a lot to wrap up not just current plot lines but future plot lines as well, they still left us with a big, fun question: Does Ben or Leslie become President? It seems like one of them may have taken the most powerful position in the country (at least, other than being one of Beyonce’s children), but it’s unclear who. That leaves room for fun speculation. Everyone can have their own idea of what happened, just like at the end of a great book. A finale obviously needs to have elements that are clearly final, but a good finale also has elements that can be up to the interpretation or imagination of the viewer.


But not all finales are good. Take, for example, the end of “Gilmore Girls.” (For the record, I consider “Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life” the end of “Gilmore Girls.” Unless, of course, they end up doing more. I doubt they will though.) Never before had I seen a finale end with such a cliffhanger. Rory is pregnant? Who’s the father? (Logan, probably. Although it could be someone else!) How is all of that going to go down? That’s not a small loose end or a question that can be left to the interpretation of the viewer. That’s question that needs to be answered…like, now. And the craziest part of it all is that those final four words, that big reveal, was reportedly part of creator Amy Sherman-Palladino’s plan all along.


That’s where I think series finales can veer into dangerous territory. Deciding down to the most specific details how you will end your show when you’re just starting it seems to set yourself (and, as a result, the viewers) up for disappointment. Even if you have every single moment of the series mapped out from beginning to end, things can still change and mutate based on current culture and the views of a show’s fans. Series creators and writers shouldn’t be beholden to the views of fans, of course, but it feels like a disservice to completely ignore their hopes and wishes for the end of a series they’ve been watching for years and just focus on some idea you had a long time ago.


And that brings me to what I consider the worst series finale I’ve ever seen. So bad that I haven’t watched a single frame of the show since the finale aired and have gone so far as to only refer to it as “the awful show I will not name.” It rhymes with “Shmow Shmi Shmet Shmour Shmother.” The final moments of the series completely eschewed every thing leading up to it, the whole premise of the show really, to service an ending that had been thought of many years prior. While some people (insane people, if you ask me) were fine with it, many others were horrified and upset. It’s hard to find a list of “Worst TV Series Finales” without this one being prominently featured. Sure, it ties up just about every loose end (in the worst ways possible), but the only questions it left its viewers with were Why? and How could you? and What was the point of anything that led up to this? It proved that just because you have an ending in mind from the beginning doesn’t mean you should stick to that ending when all is said and done. Much like “Gilmore Girls,” this show got too far in, and the ending they had imagined didn’t make sense anymore.


Making a good series finale is challenging. Stuck between maintaining a creative vision and at least somewhat catering to the fans, shows can either find the balance and succeed (like “Orphan Black” and “Parks and Rec”) or fail (like “Gilmore Girls” or that…other one). At least we can all agree on the fact that shows largely benefit from having a set finale that they can prepare for, not one that just happens because a show was cancelled. Like “Pitch.” Did you think I forgot about “Pitch”? I’ll never forget about “Pitch.” Bring back “Pitch”!


What do you think makes a good series finale? Have any other finales that you loved (or hated)? Did you also attempt to watch the Teen Choice Awards last night but gave up after the 5th tween you didn’t recognize? We can figure it out together in the comments. And of course…


Stay classy.


‘Hot Rod’ Is (Quietly) One of the Best Comedies of the Last 10 Years

This past week the wonderful (and woefully under appreciated, until quite recently) “Hot Rod” celebrated the 10th anniversary of its release. It follows the totally normal story of Rod Kimble and his mission to do dope stunts and raise enough money for his step-dad’s heart surgery…so he can finally defeat him in their regular wrestling matches, of course. It’s one of my favorite movies of all time and it’s crazy to think that its been 10 years since it first came out.


I ended up happening upon it a year or so after its release when my mother brought it home for me from Blockbuster (RIP Blockbuster, the best place ever), saying “I saw this and it looked like something you might like.” Luckily, she was right and I spread it amongst my friends like wildfire, so that when I said “cool beans” in weird voice they wouldn’t look at me like I was an insane person.


My experience with discovering “Hot Rod” and falling in love with it seems to be the way many of its most ardent fans found it. When it was first released 10 years ago, it didn’t receive the most positive of responses from critics and viewers alike. It was, in a way, ahead of its time. Starring Andy Samberg and Jorma Taccone, among others, and directed by Akiva Shaffer, it was basically a Lonely Island movie before The Lonely Island was even a thing (or, at least, a thing people knew about).


Much like the best Lonely Island songs and sketches, what set “Hot Rod” apart from the other bro-y comedies it might be grouped in with was that it took already funny premises and pushed them to the most absurd extremes. Take, for example, the scene above. It starts out as a somewhat stereotypical scene from an inspirational sports movie, with the whole town rallying behind one man. It quickly evolves into a musical and then devolves into a riot. The absurdity of it all isn’t lost on the characters, who immediately call out how crazy it was. It’s executed so well, equal parts clever and silly.


While many comedies now are big and brash with their jokes, they don’t necessarily do it well. “Hot Rod” had those big and brash qualities, but it didn’t feel like any of it was forced. It all felt natural and right for the characters, their personalities and their situation, which is probably why so many people have gravitated toward the movie in recent years.


If you have somehow missed out on the joy that is “Hot Rod” in the last 10 years, what are you doing? Go watch it! NOW. Seriously, whatever you were doing before you started reading this can wait. You’ll be happy you did. I know I was.


Have you seen “Hot Rod”? Have any other under appreciated comedies that you love? Still mad that “Pitch” got cancelled? Me too. Why, Fox, why????? Leave your thoughts in the comments. Cool beans? Cool beans. And, of course…


Stay classy.


Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑